Unlike the previous handouts, Windows and Mirrors was an easy and an interesting read. The concept of comparing Interface with windows and mirrors broadened my arena of knowledge on this subject. It got me into thinking what would gmail/yahoo be categorized under or what would Facebook be categorized under and so on. But, I think its not possible to categorize them under one. They are mix of both, not necessarily in equal proportion. Gmail/Yahoo are more like a window while Facebook is more of a mirror. Google hangout and an online radio would be more of a mirror since they provides one with a compelling experience. At times, the difference between both seem really blurred because each interface is a mix of both. The drawbacks of Windows as suggested by Bolter and Gromala are the ones even I have myself witnessed. Having used both, I surely agree with the view put forward by authors that Windows owing to its idea of sticking to consistency have failed to think beyond or rather be creative enough like their Mac counterparts. To me, Windows seem more machine like while Mac seems more smart human like. The point made on Page. 74, 'Usability testing must come to appreciate the need for the interface to oscillate between transparency and its opposite. It must learn to measure this oscillation, which in fact defines each digital interface.' really got me into thinking that there is a lot that goes into creating an Interface. It is not the mere usage of words and design in their most basic form, but usage of words and designs that are reflective and transparent, the ones that delivers information and provides a compelling experience to its users.
No comments:
Post a Comment